[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security

To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Subject: Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
From: "L. V. Lammert" <lvl@omnitec.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:06:04 -0600
In-Reply-To: <4395D71C.8030608@insightbb.com>
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20051206102123.01f5d018@mail.omnitec.net><Pine.BSO.4.53.0512060940520.6158@Mail.omnitec.net><004a01c5fa1c$40c70420$4bea83d1@Paul><Pine.BSO.4.53.0512060940520.6158@Mail.omnitec.net><4.3.2.7.2.20051206102123.01f5d018@mail.omnitec.net>
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org

At 12:23 PM 12/6/2005 -0600, you wrote:
>Don't you think the best security is to use CAT5? @:)>

Of course, . . as is NetBios for Windoze networking. It's a shame, really, 
that the MS world has stopped supporting (meaning default install) the BEST 
security for that environment!

         Lee


-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
  - From: Stan Zaske <zaske@insightbb.com>
- Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
  - From: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@ieee.org>

References:
- Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
  - From: "L. V. Lammert" <lvl@omnitec.net>
- Re: Verizon DSL
  - From: "L. V. Lammert" <lvl@omnitec.net>
- Verizon DSL
  - From: "Paul Cash" <cash@globaleyes.net>
- Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
  - From: Stan Zaske <zaske@insightbb.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
Next by Date: Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
Prev by thread: Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
Next by thread: Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread