[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gnome's dependence on networking...

To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Subject: Re: Gnome's dependence on networking...
From: "Robert G. (Doc) Savage" <dsavage@peaknet.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:19:12 -0600
In-Reply-To: <1112043236.6994.14.camel@kkeefe2.cs.uiuc.edu>
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
References: <2.1-3166569-403-B-OEWW@smtpauth.earthlink.net> <1112043236.6994.14.camel@kkeefe2.cs.uiuc.edu>
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org

On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 14:53 -0600, Ken Keefe wrote:
> Here is the contents of that ifcfg file:
> 
> DEVICE=eth0
> ONBOOT=yes
> TYPE=Ethernet
> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> IPADDR=192.168.1.29
> USERCTL=no
> PEERDNS=yes
> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
> IPV6INIT=no

Ken,

I think your ifcfg-eth0 is missing a couple of lines:

BOOTPROTO=static
BROADCAST=192.168.1.255

--Doc

-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.

References:
- Re: Gnome's dependence on networking...
  - From: "Bryan J.Smith" <b.j.smith@ieee.org>
- Re: Gnome's dependence on networking...
  - From: Ken Keefe <kaje@digitalfamily.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Still having troubles with a server's static IP...
Next by Date: resizing partitions (was: Did I stump the band?)
Prev by thread: Re: Gnome's dependence on networking...
Next by thread: Re: Gnome's dependence on networking...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread